<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Destroy Today &#187; Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://destroytoday.com/blog/tag/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog</link>
	<description>Jonnie is back to work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Poll: Replies vs Mentions</title>
		<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/11/poll-replies-vs-mentions/</link>
		<comments>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/11/poll-replies-vs-mentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DestroyTwitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destroytoday.com/blog/?p=1419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In implementing Lists as a replacement for Groups, the navigation changes a bit. I&#8217;m wondering if I should finally give in to the official Twitter nomenclature and replace &#8220;Replies&#8221; with &#8220;Mentions.&#8221; There are pros and cons to both. &#8220;Replies&#8221; isn&#8217;t entirely correct since you can be mentioned in a tweet and it not be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1420" title="Replies vs Mentions" src="http://destroytoday.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/replies_vs_mentions.gif" alt="Replies vs Mentions" width="450" height="100" /></p>
<p>In implementing Lists as a replacement for Groups, the navigation changes a bit. I&#8217;m wondering if I should finally give in to the official Twitter nomenclature and replace &#8220;Replies&#8221; with &#8220;Mentions.&#8221; There are pros and cons to both. &#8220;Replies&#8221; isn&#8217;t entirely correct since you can be mentioned in a tweet and it not be a response. &#8220;Mentions&#8221; institutes another eight-letter &#8220;M&#8221; word, which could be confusing at quick glance. &#8220;Replies&#8221; widens the gap between the two sides and &#8220;Mentions&#8221; makes it a bit even. What do you think? Comment your reasoning.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/11/poll-replies-vs-mentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you use regular expressions with Include/Exclude keywords in DestroyTwitter?</title>
		<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/do-you-use-regular-expressions-with-includeexclude-keywords-in-destroytwitter/</link>
		<comments>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/do-you-use-regular-expressions-with-includeexclude-keywords-in-destroytwitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DestroyTwitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destroytoday.com/blog/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you answer yes, please comment what regular expression you use.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p>If you answer <em>yes</em>, please comment what regular expression you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/do-you-use-regular-expressions-with-includeexclude-keywords-in-destroytwitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DestroyTwitter in-app photo viewing within the main window or in its own?</title>
		<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/in-app-photo-viewing-within-the-main-window-or-in-its-own/</link>
		<comments>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/in-app-photo-viewing-within-the-main-window-or-in-its-own/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DestroyTwitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destroytoday.com/blog/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve decided to rethink things a bit in DestroyTwitter, so I&#8217;ll be conducting a survey over the next few weeks. Today&#8217;s question is whether in-app photo viewing is working within the main window or should it be its own window? There are benefits to both, but what do you think?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to rethink things a bit in <a href="http://destroytwitter.com" target="_blank">DestroyTwitter</a>, so I&#8217;ll be conducting a survey over the next few weeks. Today&#8217;s question is whether in-app photo viewing is working within the main window or should it be its own window? There are benefits to both, but what do you think?</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/in-app-photo-viewing-within-the-main-window-or-in-its-own/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which window chrome setting do you use in DestroyTwitter and why?</title>
		<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/which-window-chrome-setting-do-you-use-in-destroytwitter-and-why/</link>
		<comments>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/which-window-chrome-setting-do-you-use-in-destroytwitter-and-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DestroyTwitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destroytoday.com/blog/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there any other answers not listed here, feel free to fill up the comments. Also, if you&#8217;d like to extend your answer, further commenting is encouraged.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p>If there any other answers not listed here, feel free to fill up the comments. Also, if you&#8217;d like to extend your answer, further commenting is encouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/08/which-window-chrome-setting-do-you-use-in-destroytwitter-and-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Why is low memory usage important to you?</title>
		<link>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/07/poll-why-is-low-memory-usage-important-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/07/poll-why-is-low-memory-usage-important-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonnie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destroytoday.com/blog/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://destroytoday.com/blog/2009/07/poll-why-is-low-memory-usage-important-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
